Tuesday, October 25, 2011

I Wanna Be Adored

For many reasons 1989 was a good year, maybe the best year of my life. And I think, to top it off, I was exposed to an absurd amount of new music in 1989 and 1990. Anyway, it just so happened that one of the best albums of all time came out that year, the self-titled Stone Roses album, which had just come out in March or April or something. I have no idea where or how I heard that album first, but I do remember how it was the soundtrack to many a night. I have this distinct memory of eating chicken wings (!) with K. at some late night eatery, no doubt super drunk, watching the TV and them showing the video to "I Wanna Be Adored." Without any kind of qualification, I can say it's one of the most sublimely beautiful songs ever recorded, perfect for when you're alone or with company. And the album was just as brilliant. What songs! Anyway, turns out the Stone Roses are reforming. You know me, I'm totally against any band reforming to relive bygone glories. So I wish they hadn't. But I don't wish them ill. They will never recapture 1989 again but, you know, who would begrudge them for making the money that they originally never made. There is probably no other band in the history of pop music that burned so brightly but so briefly. They were here for one spectacular album, a series of fantastic singles and then completely and immediately burned out. The second album was a disaster. And then they split up. But what a beautiful set of songs they left behind

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I wanna ador Ian Brown ....again.

Anonymous said...

I like the new look, Spaceman.

Anonymous said...

But I liked the old one better...

spaceman said...

Yeah, the new look is...interesting. I actually didn't want to change from the old look but I think I upgraded or something and they basically changed the whole format. It was a surprise. Now I don't know how to change back.

ghostroad said...

A couple of years ago, the Quietus ran two excellent articles on the Roses. The first one, by Neil Kulkarni, is a breathtaking trashing of their self-titled:

http://thequietus.com/articles/02535-the-stone-roses-the-stone-roses-reissue-album-review

The second, by John Tatlock, is an incredibly informative rejoinder to the first, fleshing out a lot of history and where the band was coming from:

http://thequietus.com/articles/02573-from-atlanta-georgia-to-longsight-manchester-the-stone-roses-weren-t-what-you-thought-they-were

Both excellent.